News

Important Checklists for Upcoming Elections

We still await comprehensive election reform. Our recommendation is Gold Standard Elections, and we provide detailed guidelines, processes, and procedures in our white paper, available here and at goldstandardelections.com. However, given that the current electronic system is still in place, we need to provide guidance to monitor and audit our elections. In this video, Gold Standard Election team members Laura Scharr and Rick Weible break down a checklist of action items for candidates, poll watchers/observers, poll workers, and voters. The most important thing that you can do is VOTE. Turnout for your primary and general elections.

  1. Candidate checklist
  • Confirm your name is spelled correctly at the state and or county offices and that your name is pronounced correctly for any disability devices; confirm that your name is on ALL sample ballots that are published with the public notice.
  • Review your state statute and rules for all deadlines- e.g., Canvassing of your counties, state, and when challenges and legal filings need to be submitted, recounts, post-election audit, absentee ballot processing, provisional ballot reviews, absentee deadlines, etc.
  • Send performance letters to the SEC, AG office, etc., cc: DOJ
  • Interview attorneys proactively who have election experience to ensure a timely challenge, if necessary.
  • Ensure your party/campaign has sufficient poll watchers/workers; recruit as needed.
  • Confirm that your name is in every precinct where you qualify and all ballot styles for that precinct.
  • L&A Testing*: Attend and ensure that the counties are following your state laws; FOIA all results

Does the test deck include:

  • Every Ballot Type—Ballot on demand, pre-printed, and all barcoded style ballot for in-person voting?Every Ballot Style/Precinct?
  • Is a different number of votes assigned to each contest group (every person or question) on the ballot? If any contest has no votes selected, it is an invalid test; i.e., every option for each race must be tested.
  • Undervotes?–Instances where the voter didn’t vote for a candidate or for fewer than the required candidates or selections?
  • Overvotes? — apply mainly to absentee or hand-marked ballots and occur when the person voted for more people or options than indicated.
  • Blank Ballots?  How many? (at least 10)
  • Folded ballots? (absentee ballots should be tested as well) This ensures that no folds cross over the ovals
  • Write-In votes?
  • Unique number of votes cast per candidate/per race?
  • Poll workers and observers needed for machine testing, early voting, and election day, absentee ballot processing, post-election audits, and canvassing/certification at the county where provisional votes are reviewed, as well as any recounts!
  • FOIA early voting poll lists and post-election poll tapes
  • Attend post-election audits; ideally, these should be conducted for races/precincts that are close and not for unopposed races.
  • Consider requesting a hand count for precincts that are close.

SC Specific Information for Candidates

Here is a structured, election-administration–level overview of key dates, statutory timing rules, and procedural deadlines for the 2026 South Carolina state primary (June 9, 2026), along with what is fixed statewide vs. varies by county.

Core Election Timeline (2026 SC Primary)

  • Primary Election Day: June 9, 2026
  • Runoff (if needed): June 23, 2026

Absentee Voting Deadlines

Requesting absentee ballot

  • Deadline: May 29, 2026 (5:00 PM)
  • Statutory rule:
    • In person: up to 11 days before the election
    • By mail: must be received ~4 days prior to the Emergency absentee voting
  • June 5–June 9, 2026 (hospitalized voters) Returning absentee ballots
  • Due: June 9, 2026 (by close of polls, 7 PM) must be received by Election Day (not postmarked) except for UOCAVA (+2 days)

Early Voting May 26 – June 5, 2026

Voter Registration

Deadline: May 11, 2026, by mail

Sample Ballots

  • Available via the state voter portal (SCVotes) once ballots are finalized.
  • Typical timing:

~45–30 days before election, generally late April–mid May 2026

Logic & Accuracy (L&A) Testing (see law below SC Code § 7-13-1390)

  • Required before every election AND before and after the count. Public notice requirements 5 days prior to testing. Conducted by county election offices
  • Must be:
    • Publicly noticed
    • Open to observers

Timing (typical SC practice)

  • 1–3 weeks before early voting begins
  • So for the 2026 primary:
    • Likely mid–late May 2026

👉 Exact dates vary by county and are posted locally.

Canvassing & Certification

County Canvass

  • Begins immediately after the election
  • Must be completed:
    • By Thursday/Friday after the election (~June 12–13, 2026)
      (statutory window: within a few days)

State Canvass (State Election Commission)

  • Typically:
    • ~1 week after the election
    • Around June 17–18, 2026

👉 Certification occurs after county reports are finalized.

What happens in canvass

  • Provisional ballot adjudication
  • Absentee final acceptance/rejection
  • Reconciliation:
    • ballots cast vs. voters checked in
  • Certification of county results

👉 This is THE key challenge window

Recounts & Challenges

Automatic recount threshold

South Carolina law:

  • ≤ 1% margin triggers recount (for many offices)

Types of recounts

  • Machine recount (automatic)
  • Hand recount (rare, ordered by court)

Protest/contest deadlines

County-level protest

  • Filed with the county board:
    • Within 48 hours after the results are declared

Appeal to the state

  • Filed with State Election Commission:
    • Shortly after the county decision (tight statutory window)

Judicial challenge

  • Filed in court after administrative remedies

👉 These timelines are very compressed (days, not weeks).

Ballot certification

  • Occurs after filing closes and challenges are resolved
  • Drives:
    • sample ballot release
    • L&A testing prep

Poll Worker Deadlines

  • Counties must:
    • Recruit & appoint poll managers
    • Train prior to early voting

Typical timeline:

  • Recruitment: March–May
  • Final assignments: ~2–3 weeks before the election

Additional Operational Milestones

Absentee ballots sent out

  • Federal requirement:
    • 45 days before the election (for military/overseas voters)
  • For 2026:
    • ~late April 2026

Ballot printing & distribution

  • Late April → early May

🧭 Summary Timeline

PhaseDate (2026)
Candidate filing opensMarch 16
Absentee ballots begin mailing~Late April
Sample ballots availableLate April–May
L&A testing (public)Mid–late May
Voter registration deadlineMay 11
Absentee request deadlineMay 29
Early votingMay 26 – June 5
Election DayJune 9
Absentee return deadlineJune 9
County canvass~June 10–13
State certification~June 17–18
Runoff (if needed)June 23

2. Poll Observer Checklist

  • Opening of polls: Were you able to observe the “0” tape at the opening of the election? Were the ballot boxes empty and secure?  
  • If your state law requires it, review any configuration reports.
  • If your state law requires it, ensure that the L&A test was performed pre- and post-tabulator use. (If this is done, they must do an additional 0 tape to clear out the test totals.
  • Confirm that their equipment list matches the chain-of-custody documents.
  • Are the security seals on the top of the tabulator and on the ballot boxes intact and unvoided? Seals should not be opened during the election. If any seals need to be removed, is it being documented?
  • Does the site have an incident log?
  • Are poll workers asking for ID?
  • Were there issues with invalid IDs or people who moved more than 30 days prior to the election? Depends on your state law.
  • Machine issues or “glitches” where one name is pressed, and another name is registered on the ballot marking device? Is this being documented on the incident log?
  • Are the tabulators working properly? Were emergency ballots used, or regular ballots needed to be added to the provisional ballot box without being counted by the tabulator?
  • Check that the tabulator count and poll list reconcile at the end of each day of voting: Voters Checked In should = Votes cast + Provisional Ballots + Spoiled Ballots
  • End of election night—secure poll tape images—take photos, if possible, for all precincts in the county
  • Document if a thumb drive is being removed and if they are transmitting election results via modem
  • Ensure all seals have been documented for all tabulators or ballot boxes, and at the end of the night. Confirm that the parties that transfer these items back to the county are being documented.
  • Consider having someone document the vehicles and boxes at the county when they arrive, with the seals intact.
  • Does there appear to be bipartisan representation for poll workers for that precinct or location?
  • Has any voter been told they’ve already voted? Document the outcome

3. Poll Worker Checklist

  • Same steps issue as above
  • Be on the lookout for potential ballot harvesting, groups of people coming in who may have suspect IDs, or being led by one particular person.
  • Were there any incidents that needed to be reported? (handicap accessibility issues, issues with curbside voting, or machine malfunction?) Other poll workers who were not abiding by the laws? Any technicians or other voters who had access to the machine flash drives, seals, etc.?)
  • Consider keeping a separate check-in list (paper vote roster) for all voters to reconcile with the electronic poll books; can preprint names in alphabetical order or a blank numerical roster.
  • Check the total number of registered voters in the county on the poll pads each hour during the day. Does it change? Record it. Also, the mail/absentee ballot numbers and early vote numbers. The number of early voting (in-person) should stay fixed after the early vote period.
  • If your state law requires, do not initial more ballots than the number of voters in the line. Spoil any stamped or initialed ballots at the end of the night.
  • Or if your state doesn’t initial or stamp each ballot document, unused/spoiled ballots.

4. Voter Checklist

  • Research the candidates. Contact your local party to see where any debates are taking place.
  • Check the candidates’ voting records if they are current office holders.
  • Read local respected news articles on the candidates.
  • Research the candidates’ websites. Call them if need be or try to meet them at a candidate forum.
  • Review the sample ballot for your precinct.
  • Review campaign finance reports—Open Secrets, or the federal/state campaign finance sites or FEC.gov
  • Don’t rely on friends’ opinions unless they are extremely knowledgeable.
  • VOTE! Turnout is key, especially in the primaries; bring your ID and some friends
  • Don’t necessarily rely on your party’s endorsements; be an independent thinker
  • Consider serving as a poll watcher for a campaign or as a poll worker.
  • Encourage your friends and family members to vote!

The best way to beat a potential cheat is to overwhelm the polls. Here is a related blog post:

How to be an informed voter this year

Here is a video that explains this in more detail.

Here is the SC code for L&A testing and a list of additional questions

 Machine testing SC Code § 7-13-1390*

(a) The election officials of each county shall cause the proper ballot labels to be placed on each vote recorder which is to be used in any election within such county and shall cause each vote recorder to be placed in proper order for voting.

(b) The election officials of each county shall appoint one custodian of vote recorders, and such deputy custodians as may be necessary, whose duty it shall be to prepare the vote recorders to be used in county elections. Each custodian and deputy custodian shall receive such compensation as provided for in the annual county appropriation. Such custodian shall, under the direction of the county election officials, have charge of and represent them during the preparation of the vote recorders as required by this article, and he and the deputy custodians, whose duty it shall be to assist him in the discharge of his duties, shall serve at the pleasure of the county election officials.

(c) On or before the third day preceding an election, the county election officials shall have the tabulating machines tested to ascertain that they will correctly count the votes cast for all offices and on all questions. Public notice of the time and place of the test shall be made at least five days prior thereto. Representatives of political parties and bodies, candidates, news media and the public shall be permitted to observe such tests. The test shall be conducted by processing a pre-audited group of ballot cards clearly marked for such purpose, not to exceed fifty for each candidate or question, so punched or marked as to record a predetermined number of valid votes for each candidate and on each question, and shall include for each office one or more ballot cards which have votes in excess of or less than the number allowed by law in order to test the ability of the tabulating machine to reject such votes. The tabulating machine shall not be approved unless it produces an errorless counting. If any error is detected, the cause therefor shall be ascertained and corrected, and an errorless count shall be made before the machine is approved. The same test shall be repeated immediately before the start of the official count of the ballot cards and at the conclusion of such count. The county election officials or custodian shall also prepare the vote recorders for voting at the various polling places to be used in the election. In preparing the vote recorders, they shall arrange the recorders and the ballot labels so that they meet all requirements of voting and counting at such primary or election, thoroughly inspect and test the vote recorders, and file a certificate, as prescribed by the State Election Commission, in the office of the county election officials that the recorders are in proper order with correct ballot labels.

(d) Prior to the election, no county election officials, nor custodian, nor other employee shall in any way prevent free access to and examination of all voting machines which are to be used at the election under proper supervision and, at reasonable times, by any interested persons.

HISTORY: 1962 Code SECTION 23-400.109; 1970 (56) 2022.

Educating the upstate-Key steps to fixing our elections

Laura Scharr and Julie Baker traveled to Simsonville to address the following issues regarding elections:

  1. Julie spoke about why we cannot use electronic, mobile, internet, blockchain, or lottery-style voting systems.
  2. Since electronic voting is not trustworthy and can be infiltrated by nefarious actors to cheat at scale, Laura described the path we do need to take — the Gold Standard for elections.
  3. We then demonstrated our Gold Standard Tally method, and the whole room participated. We then broke people up into a few tables to practice on their own.

The only way we fix our elections and maintain our republic is through a National Emergency Authorization for federal elections that bans electronic voting and moves to a decentralized, locally controlled system controlled by the people.

SHOCKING: Cloned voters caught in Texas GOP primary

Computer expert Dr. Walter Daugherity exposes patterns of potential fraud across states + deep dive into Bexar County’s “Bexar anomaly” (synthetic IDs, fake check-ins?)

This MUST-WATCH video will change how you see elections forever. Watch NOW before it’s censored and send it to anyone who claims that there are no issues with our voting systems. We have to move to the gold standard for elections asaap!

https://rumble.com/v777gfk-this-scary-video-makes-the-case-for-hand-marked-hand-counted-paper-ballots.html

Credit: Lori Gallagher, Dr. Andrew Paquette, Dr. Daugherity. We NEED hand-marked, hand-counted paper ballots NOW. One day voting. Verified citizens only.

South Carolina Demands the Gold Standard: Our Press Conference Call for Real Election Reform

If our votes don’t count accurately, we’ve lost the very soul of our Republic. That’s why on Thursday—February 26, 2026—we gathered at the State House with passionate patriots from every corner of our state, Congressman Ralph Norman, Attorney General candidate David Pascoe, and State Representative Rob Harris to demand better.

We’re not just complaining—we’re offering solutions. The current system falls short: black-box electronic machines owned by opaque corporations hide how votes are counted. Voters can’t see, verify, or trust the process. National polls show nearly two-thirds of Americans worry these machines could be hacked or manipulated remotely. In South Carolina, limited observer access, weak chain of custody, unattended machines, and inaccessible audit data only fuel the distrust.

But doubt doesn’t have to win. Momentum is building for real change. We presented our vision: the Gold Standard Elections Act (H.4295), a proven path to secure, transparent, verifiable, and accessible elections for eligible voters only.

Key pillars of the Gold Standard:

  • Strict government-issued photo ID with no exceptions
  • Citizenship-only registration and voting
  • Hand-marked paper ballots—no computers or machines
  • Hand-counting at the precinct level using our efficient, tested GS Tally method (cheaper than machines, finished by midnight!)
  • Clean voter rolls, small precincts (max 1,500 voters), paper poll books
  • Minimal mail-in ballots (military, overseas, legitimate absentees only)
  • One Election Day

South Carolina can lead the South—and the nation—by passing H.4295. When every vote is counted publicly and verifiably, confidence returns, turnout rises, and our Republic thrives.

Watch the full press conference video here:

This isn’t a partisan issue. It’s about providing elections for the people by the people. Join us. Contact your legislators. Demand the Gold Standard. Together, let’s make South Carolina the beacon of election excellence.

Thank you for standing with us. Our best days are ahead when our citizens have confidence that their vote counts.

A walk through the SC election process

Written by: Laura Downing, Hugh Penri-Williams, CFE, Laura Scharr, Julie Baker

The summary below was written for Oconnee County, but it applies to the rest of South Carolina.

As you can see, the process is complex, involving many people, electronics, and procedures that are neither transparent nor auditable to the people.

Pass the SAVE America Act and get rid of the “machines”

Congress is responding to calls for greater election integrity and has recently introduced two bills that would revolutionize federal elections.

The SAVE Act, which was passed in May of 2025, was revised to add Voter ID requirements for voting, and reintroduced on 1-29-26. In addition, the Make Elections Great Again Act was introduced on 1-29-26 and codifies similar provisions for proof of citizenship and Voter ID, while also addressing other measures to reduce potential election mail fraud.

Here is a summary of both bills and our take on them.

Congress must pass the SAVE Act ASAP, and if the MEGA bill can be amended, that would be a good step forward in securing elections. Ideally, we must move to the gold standard of elections.

In other words, we must get rid of electronic voting systems! Here is why.

Here is a video that summarizes the two bills, and a chart below that provides a quick reference for their basic components.

Save Amerca ActMEGA Act
Election Integrity BillsSave America Act “Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act” 1-29-26 introduction   Effective upon enactmentRequires that non-citizens be removed from voter rolls using the DHS SAVE (Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements) system, the Social Security Administration, and State IDs that confirm citizenship status; must comply with federal requests for information to ascertain citizenship
Voter rolls/Database sharingPreservation of records to include audit records, certification records, chain of custody, incident reports, reconciliation records, return envelopes, tabulation reports, tech records, and vote-by-mail records.State shall match voter registration data to Motor vehicle data, Motor Vehicle shall match with Social Security data, and State shall receive data from AG for felonies/etc. DHS on citizenship records.   May use the SAVE system to confirm citizenship. DHS shall conduct investigations to determine removal from lists if unlawfully registered in States, and AG shall share info of potential fraud with  
Citizenship to registerMust have proof of citizenship when registering to voteMust have proof of citizenship when registering to vote
Documentary proofRequired to vote in person for federal election. Absentee voting- must include a copy of an eligible photo ID with the request and submission of the ballot  Include documentary proof of citizenship plus last 4 of the SS# and current valid DL or documentary proof of residence in the state   If no SS# a unique identifying voter number will be assigned applicant may sign attestation under penalty of perjury with an affidavit.    
Removal of noncitizensUpon receipt of documentation that the registrant is a noncitizen 
Photo IDUS passport, REAL ID, US Military ID, valid government-issued photo card showing place of birth in the US, government-issued valid photo ID with birth certificate. Must provide a sworn affidavit if you have no proof, and provide other evidence that sufficiently establishes citizenship.Each state shall at least every 30 days verify eligibility of registrants through all state resources and the SAVE system and remove those who are ineligible by reason of 1) request 2) criminal conviction or mental incapacity pursuant to state law 3) death 4) change in residence 5) citizenship status 6) duplicate registrant States shall remove names of ineligible no later than 15 days prior to each general election.   Requires applicants for motor vehicle driver’s licenses in a new state to indicate whether that state is their residence for voting purposes.   Citizenship should be indicated on drivers’ licenses   There must be a notification to state election officials of those who were recused from jury duty due to non-citizenship
OtherMust provide to vote in person, the vote is provisional, but allows a religious objection affidavit. Other than in person, you must submit a copy of a valid photo ID with the ballot or the last four digits of your SS# and an affidavit. Exceptions: active duty absent uniformed services voter who is absent from the US on the date of the election; Disabled or Elderly Automatic Voter Registration (AVR) at DMVs—where eligible citizens are registered unless they opt out—would be severely limited or gutted in practice, as people would need to present citizenship documents during routine DMV visits, which most don’t bring for license renewals or address changes.   The bill amends Section 5 of the NVRA to make DMV license applications subject to the new citizenship proof rules, meaning states can’t process voter registration through DMV without that proof.
Record retention requirements Ballots must be voter-verifiable (NEED TO include amendment that differentiates between a true “paper ballot” and a “Ballot Summary Card”
Abolished barcode tracking for Mail-in Ballots   The requirement is for voter-verifiable paper ballots that allow the use of ballot-marking devices but also provide the option to manually mark each ballot at every in-person location.   Can be counted manually, OR by a counting device, OR read by a ballot tabulator. The paper that comes out of a BMD is a ballot summary card. NOT a paper ballot  
Ranked Choice Voting Prohibited
Make Elections Great Again. Introduced 1-29-26. Applies to elections held in 2027 and beyond Must provide to vote in person, the vote is provisional, but allows a religious objection affidavit. Other than in person, must submit a copy of a valid photo ID with the ballot or the last four digits of SS# and an affidavit. Exceptions: active duty absent uniformed services voter who is absent from the US on the date of the election; Disabled or Elderly
Universal Mail-in Voting Ballots received by Election Day
Election Bills Update: Key Developments in the SC Legislature

This week, both the South Carolina Senate Judiciary Committee and House Judiciary Committee held important discussions on election-related legislation.

Proof of Citizenship for Voter Registration (S. 128):

The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on S. 128, South Carolina’s SAVE Act equivalent. Sponsored by Senator Michael Johnson (R-York), the bill requires satisfactory proof of U.S. citizenship—such as a driver’s license indicating citizenship, passport, birth certificate, or other approved documents—when registering to vote in state elections.

This directly supports the 2024 constitutional amendment (overwhelmingly passed by voters) that restricts voting in South Carolina elections to U.S. citizens only. The bill adds enforceable protocols to ensure voter registration complies with this mandate.

After discussion and testimony, the committee carried the bill over. Senator Thompson intends to propose minor amendments to address any potential constitutional issues and position it for stronger passage moving forward.

Closing Primaries: Bills H. 3643 and H. 3310:

In the House Judiciary Committee, a packed hearing addressed H. 3643 and H. 3310, which seek to close partisan primaries by limiting participation to voters registered with the respective party (or declaring independent status).

The discussion drew strong public turnout and passionate testimony. Supporters highlighted that taxpayer-funded primaries should reflect party members’ choices, free from interference from outsiders. Critics raised concerns about forcing people to choose affiliations or advocated alternatives such as party conventions.

Rep. Brandon Newton noted early on the major obstacles:

  1. The Governor has signaled he would veto the bills.
  2. The Senate appears uninterested in pursuing them this session.
  3. Deep divisions persist within the Republican Party on the issue.

Committee Chair Jay Jordan recognized the range of views expressed and stressed the importance of reconciliation, revisions, and building a broader consensus before any advancement. It looks like closed primary legislation is dead for this session.

These hearings underscore the active debates around election security and party rules in South Carolina. We will continue to track progress and share more as things develop—whether through committee action, floor votes, or public input opportunities. Your voice continues to play a key role!

How to Be an Informed Voter This Election Year

In a world that’s moving faster than ever, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed by politics. Many of us are juggling work, family, and daily life, leaving little time to delve into election details. Others are simply frustrated with the constant gridlock, scandals, and broken promises. But here’s the thing: we all share a common goal—to leave a better world for our children and grandchildren. Whether it’s cleaner air, stronger schools, or a fairer economy, our votes shape that future. The good news? Becoming an informed voter doesn’t require hours of your day or a political science degree. It just takes a few smart steps to build confidence in your choices. Otherwise, we risk more of the same: stagnant taxes, unchecked fraud, and endless frustration.

This election year—2026—is particularly crucial, especially if you’re in a state like South Carolina, where gubernatorial, U.S. Senate, and state legislative races could redefine priorities on issues like education funding, healthcare access, and economic development. Low voter turnout in past cycles (particularly in the primaries) has often handed incumbents wins, perpetuating the status quo. But by engaging thoughtfully, you can help drive real change. Below, I’ll outline practical tips to get started, drawing on reliable sources and adding strategies like fact-checking to make your vote even more impactful.

Step 1: Research the Issues and Candidates Thoroughly

Knowledge is power, and starting with solid research ensures your vote aligns with what matters most to you. Don’t just skim headlines—dig a bit deeper.

  • Start with Local Resources: In South Carolina, the scstatehouse.gov website is an invaluable tool. It offers a user-friendly way to navigate bills, voting records, and committee meetings. For example, you can search for bills by keyword (like “education reform” or “tax relief”) and see how your representatives have voted. This transparency helps you spot inconsistencies between what politicians say and what they do.
  • See this tutorial below on how to navigate the scstatehouse.gov website.
  • Explore All Candidates in Your Area: Head to their websites or contact their offices to schedule a meeting or phone call to discuss their views on topics important to you.
  • Align with Your Viewpoints: List your top priorities (e.g., environmental protection, criminal justice reform, or infrastructure). Then, compare candidates’ stances. Remember, informed voting means looking beyond party lines—focus on policies that resonate with you.

Adding a layer of relevance: With 2026 bringing potential ballot measures on topics like voting rights or school choice in various states, research these too.

Step 2: Engage Actively—It Doesn’t Have to Be Time-Consuming

Research is great, but engagement turns knowledge into influence. The beauty is that many actions take minimal effort but yield big results.

  • Email Your Representatives: It only takes a few minutes to send a note to your state reps or U.S. senators about a bill that’s important to you. Use Congress.gov or scstatehouse.gov to find contact information and track bills in real time. For instance, if you’re concerned about healthcare costs, include a specific bill number in your email to make your point more effectively.
  • Stay Updated on Local Politics: Dedicate 10-15 minutes a day to reading articles from trusted South Carolina sources like FITSNews.com (for investigative journalism), Palmetto State Watch (for in-depth analysis on key issues), and, of course, check out our own South Carolina Safe Elections Substack newsletter for any breaking news on elections.  These outlets cover everything from corruption probes to policy debates, giving you context beyond national news.
  • Meet Face-to-Face: Schedule a quick meeting with your state representative or senator—it often takes just an hour. Call their office to set it up, and come prepared with questions on key topics. Cross-check their responses against their voting record on scstatehouse.gov to ensure consistency. This personal interaction can reveal a lot about their character and priorities.
  • Attend Candidate Events: Listen to candidates speak at town halls or forums. Check their social media (like X or Facebook) for event announcements, or sign up for newsletters via their campaign websites. In 2026, with races heating up, many events will be virtual, making it easier to join from home.
  • Volunteer or Contribute: If a candidate excites you, volunteer for door-knocking, phone banking, or even a small donation. This hands-on involvement not only boosts turnout but also deepens your understanding of the issues.

Step 3: Avoid Common Pitfalls and Myths

Being informed means steering clear of shortcuts that can lead you astray.

  • Don’t Rely on Friends or Neighbors: It’s tempting to ask around, but this is lazy voting. Your circle might not be as researched as you assume, and biases can creep in. Do your own homework instead.
  • Skip Name Recognition: Voting for someone just because their name sounds familiar often favors well-funded incumbents. Dig into their records—challengers fighting corruption or the status quo deserve a fair look, especially in low-turnout primaries. Do we really want to continue electing family dynasties?
  • Prioritize Primaries: Turnout in primaries is notoriously low (often under 20% in some areas), which benefits established politicians. In South Carolina’s 2026 primaries (June 9th), your vote carries extra weight. Research anti-corruption candidates or those challenging entrenched interests—they could shake things up.

Why It Matters: Building Confidence and Driving Change

By following these steps, you’ll vote with confidence, knowing your choice reflects your values and research. It’s not about perfection—it’s about progress. In 2026, with national issues like the economy, illegal immigration, crime, and fraud intersecting with state-specific challenges in South Carolina, informed voters can push for accountable leadership.

So get started today. Why wait? Share this article with a friend, and let’s build a more engaged electorate. Your voice—and vote—can make the difference for generations to come. What issue will you research first?

Closing the primaries may not be optimal if it is done with a bad bill

by Laura Scharr

The closed primary bill below is, in my view, a “Bad Bill.” Not only does it codify a strict rule based on prior voting records that disenfranchises voters and candidates, but it will likely reduce turnout, as independents may not care to or be able to vote in the primaries. States with closed primaries typically see average primary turnout of around 20.7%, while those with more open systems reach 24.5% or higher. Source: Bipartisan Policy Center

Here is a letter I wrote to the House Judiciary Subcommittee further explaining the issues:

Subject: Urgent Opposition to Bill H3643 – Protect Voter Rights and Data Integrity in South Carolina

Dear Members of the South Carolina Judiciary Committee,

As Team Leader of SC Safe Elections, a nonpartisan organization dedicated to safeguarding our electoral processes, I urge you to reject Bill H3643 as currently written. Our team has extensively studied South Carolina’s election ecosystem, including laws, procedures, and voter rolls, and we conclude that this bill poses significant risks without addressing core issues.

Closing primaries may seem appealing, but it’s a superficial fix that fails to prevent party crossover voting effectively. Instead, the real solution lies in educating qualified electors and boosting voter turnout, which would dilute the impact of any minimal crossover activity.

The bill’s most dangerous provision—the “2 out of 3” primary voting stipulation—must not be codified. This rule would disenfranchise voters and candidates while relying on unreliable data. Through years of investigations and audits, including the purchase and analysis of official voter rolls, we’ve uncovered widespread inaccuracies. For instance, primary party designations were inexplicably flipped between data files in the post-primary 2022 database, affecting more than 373,700 voters. Numerous citizens have reported erroneous records that wrongly barred them from party roles.

South Carolina’s voter data suffers from poor hygiene and data management practices, inconsistent protocols, and unclear field definitions, making it unfit for such high-stakes enforcement. This bill would create unnecessary conflicts among voters, election commissions, and parties, with no independent mechanism for voters to verify their primary status, resulting in disputes that are unverifiable “he said, she said” battles.

Do not pass H3643 in its present form. Prioritize genuine reforms that enhance trust and participation in our democratic process.

Sincerely, Laura Scharr, Team Leader, SC Safe Elections

Here is a video on some considerations for the closed primary bills:

Please contact the House Judiciary Subcommittee and its members and tell them to VOTE NO.

Contact the following representatives and tell them to vote AGAINST H.3643:

Chairman Jay Jordan – (843) 229-1874 – JayJordan@schouse.gov

Weston Newton – (803) 734-3120 – WestonNewton@schouse.gov

Cody Mitchell – (803) 427-6487 – CodyMitchell@schouse.gov

Justin Bamberg – (803) 212-6907 – JustinBamberg@schouse.gov

Spencer Wetmore – (843) 693-8292 – SpencerWetmore@schouse.gov

You can submit written testimony to HJudConstitutionalLaws@schouse.gov

Read this related article from Alaina Moore at Palmetto State Watch:

Venezuela history, memories, and how it ties to elections

The Trump administration just arrested Maduro, and the shockwaves are being felt in the election integrity movement. Trump has been on social media posting more videos, posts, and memes about stolen elections.

In this video, Nancy Pardo York, who was born in Venezuela, shares her and her family’s reaction to the Maduro arrest and how communism destroyed her home country. We then discuss how Smartmatic’s technology likely enabled Maduro to remain in power and how it has been exported to other countries. Is a similar technology involved in US elections? Is the Trump administration about to disclose more evidence? Trump appears to be suggesting that it is the next step.

Our solution to the uncertainty and untrustworthiness of the electronic voting systems is our gold standard.

THE SOLUTION

Gold Standard Elections ToolKit